Duke Energy
Digital Experience Transformation | UX Case Study
Overview
Duke Energy, one of America's largest energy holding companies serving 8.2 million customers across six states, undertook a comprehensive digital transformation initiative to modernize its customer-facing platforms. This case study documents the UX design process, strategic decisions, and outcomes that shaped the redesign of Duke Energy's digital ecosystem.
The project focused on creating a unified, accessible, and intuitive experience across web and mobile platforms, enabling customers to manage their energy accounts, understand usage patterns, and access self-service features with minimal friction.
Project At a Glance
| Duration | Team Size | Platforms | Users Served |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 Months | 12 Members | Web & Mobile | 8.2 Million |
My Role
As the Lead UX Designer on this initiative, I was responsible for driving the end-to-end design process while collaborating with cross-functional teams including product management, engineering, and customer research.
Key Responsibilities
Led design strategy and vision for the customer portal redesign
Conducted and synthesized user research to inform design decisions
Created wireframes, prototypes, and high-fidelity design specifications
Developed and maintained the design system documentation
Facilitated stakeholder workshops and design reviews
Ensured WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility compliance across all touchpoints
Collaborated with developers to ensure design fidelity in implementation
Team Structure
I worked within a cross-functional agile team consisting of product owners, business analysts, frontend and backend developers, QA engineers, and accessibility specialists. I also partnered with Duke Energy's brand team to ensure alignment with corporate identity standards.
Software Tools
A carefully selected toolkit enabled efficient collaboration, rapid iteration, and seamless handoff between design and development teams.
| Category | Tools | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Design | Figma, FigJam | UI design, prototyping, design system |
| Research | Maze, UserTesting, Hotjar | Usability testing, analytics, heatmaps |
| Collaboration | Miro, Confluence, Jira | Workshops, documentation, project tracking |
| Handoff | Zeplin, Storybook | Developer specs, component library |
| Accessibility | axe DevTools, WAVE | Accessibility auditing and testing |
Process
The design process followed a human-centered, iterative approach that balanced rigorous research with rapid prototyping and continuous validation.
Design Thinking Framework
1. Discover
Immersive research phase to understand customer needs, pain points, and behaviors through stakeholder interviews, user research, competitive analysis, and analytics review.
2. Define
Synthesis of research findings into actionable insights, persona development, journey mapping, and problem statement articulation.
3. Ideate
Collaborative brainstorming sessions, design studios, and concept exploration to generate innovative solutions addressing identified problems.
4. Prototype
Rapid creation of low and high-fidelity prototypes to visualize concepts and enable early testing and stakeholder feedback.
5. Test & Iterate
Continuous usability testing, A/B testing, and refinement based on user feedback and performance metrics.
Research
A comprehensive research strategy combined qualitative and quantitative methods to build deep understanding of customer needs and behaviors.
Research Methods
| Method | Sample Size | Key Focus |
|---|---|---|
| User Interviews | 24 participants | Deep dive into pain points and unmet needs |
| Usability Testing | 36 sessions | Task completion, error rates, satisfaction |
| Survey Research | 2,400 responses | Quantitative validation of qualitative findings |
| Analytics Review | 12 months data | Behavioral patterns, drop-off points, usage trends |
| Competitive Analysis | 8 utilities | Industry benchmarks and best practices |
Key Insights
Billing Confusion: 68% of customers found the existing bill format difficult to understand, leading to increased support calls.
Mobile Gap: 55% of customers preferred managing their account on mobile, yet the existing mobile experience was rated 2.3/5 stars.
Outage Anxiety: During outages, customers felt uninformed and frustrated by the lack of real-time communication and estimated restoration times.
Energy Awareness: Customers wanted actionable insights into their energy usage but found existing tools too complex or buried within the interface.
Key Objectives
Based on research insights and business requirements, we established clear objectives to guide the design process and measure success.
Primary Objectives
Simplify billing experience: Redesign bill presentation to improve comprehension and reduce billing-related support calls by 30%
Enhance mobile experience: Create a mobile-first responsive design achieving a minimum 4.0 app store rating
Improve outage communication: Deliver real-time, transparent outage information with accurate restoration estimates
Empower energy management: Provide accessible, actionable energy usage insights to help customers reduce consumption
Success Metrics
| Metric | Baseline | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) | 3.2 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Support Call Volume | Baseline | -30% |
| Mobile App Rating | 2.3 stars | 4.0+ stars |
| Task Completion Rate | 67% | 85%+ |
| Self-Service Adoption | 42% | 65%+ |
Challenges
Throughout the project, we navigated significant challenges that required creative problem-solving and stakeholder collaboration.
1. Legacy System Integration
The new design needed to integrate with multiple legacy backend systems that had varying data formats and API capabilities. This constraint limited some real-time functionality and required careful UX patterns to mask system latency.
Solution: Implemented optimistic UI patterns, skeleton loading states, and strategic data caching to maintain perceived performance.
2. Diverse Customer Demographics
Duke Energy serves customers ranging from tech-savvy millennials to elderly residents with limited digital literacy. Creating an experience that worked for all required balancing simplicity with functionality.
Solution: Developed a progressive disclosure approach with essential tasks surfaced prominently and advanced features accessible through contextual pathways.
3. Regulatory Compliance
Energy utilities operate under strict regulatory requirements affecting billing presentation, data privacy, and communication standards across different states.
Solution: Collaborated with legal and compliance teams early, building regulatory requirements into design documentation and creating flexible templates for state-specific variations.
4. Accessibility at Scale
Ensuring WCAG 2.1 AA compliance across a complex application with dynamic data visualizations, interactive maps, and real-time updates presented significant technical and design challenges.
Solution: Established accessibility as a core design principle from the start, conducted regular audits with assistive technology users, and created accessible component patterns in the design system.
Design
The design solution centered on a comprehensive design system that ensured consistency, scalability, and accessibility across all customer touchpoints.
Design System Foundation
Color Palette
The color system builds on Duke Energy's brand identity while ensuring WCAG AAA contrast ratios for critical interface elements.
| Color | Hex Value | Usage |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Teal | `#00789E` | Primary actions, links, key UI elements |
| Deep Navy | `#003B5C` | Headers, primary text, emphasis |
| Energy Green | `#78BE20` | Success states, positive indicators, eco features |
| Alert Orange | `#F7941D` | Warnings, notifications, attention items |
| Neutral Gray | `#333333` | Body text, secondary UI elements |
| Light Background | `#F5F5F5` | Page backgrounds, card surfaces |
| Light Teal | `#E6F3F7` | Highlight backgrounds, selected states |
Typography
A type scale optimized for readability across devices, with clear hierarchy and sufficient size for accessibility.
| Style | Font | Size | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Display | Georgia | 36px | Bold |
| Heading 1 | Georgia | 28px | Bold |
| Heading 2 | Georgia | 24px | Bold |
| Heading 3 | Georgia | 20px | Bold |
| Body | Calibri | 16px | Regular |
| Caption | Calibri | 14px | Regular |
| Label | Calibri | 12px | Bold |
Spacing Scale
| Token | Value | Usage |
|---|---|---|
| `space-xs` | 4px | Tight spacing, inline elements |
| `space-sm` | 8px | Related elements, form fields |
| `space-md` | 16px | Default component padding |
| `space-lg` | 24px | Section separation |
| `space-xl` | 32px | Major section breaks |
| `space-2xl` | 48px | Page-level spacing |
Key Design Decisions
Dashboard-First Approach: Consolidated critical information into a personalized dashboard view reducing navigation complexity
Visual Bill Redesign: Transformed the bill view with clear visual hierarchy, contextual explanations, and comparison data
Proactive Outage Experience: Integrated real-time outage maps with push notifications and accurate ETR (Estimated Time of Restoration)
Energy Insights Module: Created digestible usage visualizations with personalized recommendations for reducing consumption
Responsive Component Library: Built a comprehensive design system with 120+ components ensuring consistency and rapid development
Component Library Highlights
| Category | Components | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Navigation | 8 components | Global nav, tabs, breadcrumbs, mobile menu |
| Forms | 15 components | Inputs, selects, date pickers, validation |
| Data Display | 12 components | Cards, tables, charts, meters |
| Feedback | 10 components | Alerts, toasts, modals, progress |
| Actions | 8 components | Buttons, links, toggles, menus |
Conclusion
Impact & Results
The redesigned Duke Energy digital experience delivered measurable improvements across key performance indicators:
| Metric | Target | Achieved |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Satisfaction | 4.2 / 5 | **4.4 / 5** ✓ |
| Support Call Reduction | -30% | **-38%** ✓ |
| Mobile App Rating | 4.0 stars | **4.3 stars** ✓ |
| Task Completion Rate | 85% | **89%** ✓ |
| Self-Service Adoption | 65% | **72%** ✓ |
Key Learnings
Early Accessibility Integration: Building accessibility into the design system from the start proved far more efficient than retrofitting. This approach should be standard practice for all future projects.
Stakeholder Alignment: Regular design reviews with cross-functional stakeholders prevented late-stage conflicts and ensured business requirements were addressed throughout the design process.
Design System ROI: Investment in a comprehensive design system paid dividends in development velocity, consistency, and reduced design debt.
Future Considerations
The design system and patterns established provide a foundation for future enhancements including smart home integration, electric vehicle charging management, and renewable energy dashboards. Continuous user research and iterative improvement remain essential to evolving the experience as customer needs and technology capabilities advance.
Case study prepared for portfolio presentation
